Scored shortlists
Collaborative filtering over the co-investment graph, plus text similarity between your company and how a fund describes its own thesis. Two independent signals, one ranking.
Startup & investor discovery · data as of July 2026
18,895 investors. Yours are in there somewhere.
FundFit ranks them against your company using co-investment patterns and what funds actually write about themselves — so you start from a shortlist instead of a spreadsheet.
60,148
Startups in the graph
18,895
Investors profiled
23
Sectors covered
9
Global regions
How it works
Ranking, with the reasons attached.
Every match tells you why it surfaced. No black box, no score you have to take on faith — if the reason doesn't hold up, you skip it and move on.
Evidence on every match
Shared co-investors, sector overlap, stage fit, region and typical check size — shown as the actual reason a fund ranked where it did.
Funding history by round
Rounds deduplicated and attributed, each linked to the investors that participated — so you can trace who actually backed a company and when.
Terms and geography
Stated check sizes, stage focus and lead-or-follow behaviour where funds publish them, with regional activity across nine global markets.
How well it works
We measured it. Here's the number.
Most platforms in this category don't publish an accuracy figure. Ours is below — measured over 228 held-out companies against 29,877 candidate investors.
Why the ceiling is structural. Public records show who received money — never who
was turned down. Without rejections there is no way to learn what a fund declines, and no
amount of tuning fixes that. Use FundFit to cut thousands of investors down to a shortlist
worth researching, not to predict who will say yes.
1.4×
Better than simply listing the busiest funds. Median rank of the true investor improves
from 19,124 to 13,890.
<1%
Fewer than 1 in 100 held-out investors land inside the top 100. This is a filter, not an
oracle.
228
Held-out company–investor pairs in the evaluation, scored against 29,877 candidates.
The data
Coverage, stated plainly.
Assembled from public funding records. Not every field is filled for every record — here is what is actually populated, so you know where the gaps are before you rely on it.
Company website
85.7%
Descriptive text
78.4%
Investor terms
75.1%
Sector label
43.1%
Region label
34.4%
Stated check size
23.4%
Sector and region labels sit lower because they are inferred from text rather than reported. Anything below half is a field we would not lean on without checking it first.
Who it's for
Two sides of the same graph.
For founders
- Rank 18,895 investors against your company instead of working a static list.
- See which funds already co-invest with the ones you know.
- Filter by stage, region and stated check size before you spend a week on outreach.
- Draft a first-touch message with the match evidence already in context.
For investors
- Search 60,148 companies by sector, stage, region and funding history.
- Trace round-by-round histories with participating investors attached.
- Spot activity across nine regions, including markets outside your usual flow.
- Surface companies adjacent to what your peers are already backing.
Start from a shortlist.
FundFit is access-reviewed — request an account and we'll look at it. Founders and investors both welcome.